The Dumb Adventures of Woke Superman

‘Superman: Son of Kal-El’ is bisexual, against climate change, and an imperialist tool

Last October saw a shocking event in comics news as we learned that Superman is gay. Well, technically bisexual, though Superman: Son of Kal-El has yet to show any scenes of him being sexually attracted to a woman. Then about a week later, we learned that Superman would march in a climate change rally. One tiny little distribution issue rendered these two big moments absurd. DC had released neither comic featuring these events to the public. Superman: Son of Kal-El #5, featuring the gay kiss, came out, no pun intended, on December 28th. Superman: Son of Kal-El #7 came out on January 18th. So it’s only just recently that anyone could actually try to find out for themselves the context behind these seemingly bewildering scenes.

Press play to hear a narrated version of this story, presented by AudioHopper.

Now, you’re probably wondering why anyone would try to do a woke marketing push for comic books no one can actually read. The answer to that is simple enough. Woke messaging is its own reward. DC Comics being able to give itself a nice pat on the back for creating gay Superman is more valuable to its various parent companies than actually selling any comics. If you’ve ever wondered how it is that superhero movies are of such exceptional importance to the zeitgeist while superhero comics are almost entirely irrelevant, this is a pretty big reason why.

But it’s not for a lack of trying, at least from the perspective of the comic’s creative team. Credit given where it’s due–the climate change rally highlighted in issue #7 doesn’t completely come out of nowhere. The comic’s beginning introduced to our hero, Clark Kent’s son Jon Kent, rescuing a polar bear trapped at sea due to decreasing ice. Later events include a climate change induced wildfire…that was actually induced by a fire-themed metahuman unable to control his powers. Then in issue #7 a hibernating sea monster surfaces because of climate change deoxygenating its ocean floor water…which a supervillain looking to pick a fight also caused.

Woke Superman
Climate change is serious business, says Woke Superman (DC Comics).

The problems of the climate change metaphor in a world filled with superheroes are fairly obvious. The superheroes themselves could probably solve the issue. Or maybe they even created the issue. The point being, any message about the importance of climate change can only make sense to us as readers living in the real world. In-continuity, Superman himself could easily get rid of climate change by deploying whatever super-science nonsense also allows him to memorize entire chess strategy guidebooks within fractions of a second just to prove a point to Lex Luthor and force him to take the L. I’m not turning a phrase here, Superman himself very literally and very groansworthily forces Lex Luthor to take the L.

Internal monologues on Superman’s part where he wrings his hands about how to make people take climate change seriously don’t fare well in this context. And as far as context goes overall, I should note that there is not actually a climate change rally. That’s just the cover of Issue #7, and its so relevant to the actual content of the comic book in question I suspect the creative team came up with the cover first, spent a couple of months failing to figure out any way to actually work a climate change rally into the story, and finally just gave up.

The gay kiss scene doesn’t fare much better. While it does at least take place in the actual story, it’s kind of out of nowhere. A fire blast, which greatly enhances his abilities, hit Superman at the end of Issue #4. This is actually bad, because since he can sense nearly every single problem on Earth, his sense of personal justice compels him to try and solve every last one of them, working himself to exhaustion.

He finally lands at the door of Jay Nakamura, a refugee from the authoritarian island nation of Gamorra and fringe online journalist The Truth, for the purpose of just taking a nap in Jay’s apartment. After resting, Superman kisses Jay. They have only met a few times over the entire story. It’s a very shoehorned, irrelevant, and distracting romantic subplot that’s only really in the story at all to justify the existence of the gay kiss panel.

Woke Superman
Jon Kent, the current Superman, kisses a boy. (DC Comics).

So at this point you’re probably wondering what exactly Superman: Son of Kal-El is about, since it’s apparently about neither climate change nor Superman being gay. Well, thematically, it’s about passing the torch. The Clark Kent Superman has to go off into space indefinitely for…some reason that’s not very clear, and is leaving the Jon Kent Superman as his successor. Hence the social-justice interest. The Clark Kent Superman sees his mission as inherently unachievable, since he’s not really from Earth. Jon Kent is, and as a young person, he’s more in touch with what the world really needs.

This is all pretty inoffensive. Then the story takes a hard swerve into regime change territory. Remember Gamorra, the authoritarian island nation? This really bad guy named Henry Bendix, who stole Gamorra’s elections and won’t give them back, runs the country. Refugees are escaping from Gamorra. Henry Bendix denies this is happening, because Gamorra is a paradise no one would want to leave. Superman heroically stands up for the refugees, something which the world’s governments will not do because Gamorra has many precious natural resources that everyone needs. And so Jon Kent becomes the symbol of revolution which Clark Kent never could.

There’s an obvious political message here about the importance of standing up for refugees. This is wholesome enough on its face, but breaks down completely under almost any scrutiny. The most obvious problem with the metaphor is that it ignores who refugees actually are and what motivates them. The reference to Gamorra being a paradise and refugees being liars is an obvious reference to North Korean state propaganda. Likewise, the idea that people tolerate Gamorra being a human rights wasteland only because of its natural resources is reminiscent of how Western media often portrays China.

But authoritarian dictators outside the world order didn’t create the refugee. It was, to the contrary, created by certain esteemed members of the world order deliberately fomenting conflict in countries with governments they considered undesirable. Despite superficially attacking the refugee policy of the United States government, Superman: Son of Kal-El actually gives them a significantly more sympathetic motivation than the one in the real world–and suggests that more regime change, spearheaded by dissidents, is the solution to the problem, not the cause of it.

Despite claiming to be a woke allegory of speaking truth to power, Superman: Son of Kal-el is noteworthy mainly for providing excuses why we shouldn’t. The greatest fantasy in the series isn’t the superheroes, it’s the idea that Jay Nakamura has to resort to Internet pirate radio to get out his controversial message that countries with refugees escaping from them have bad governments. While I went into Superman: Son of Kal-el expecting to find the gay kiss and climate change elements to be absurd, I at least found them to be earnest, if clumsy. The Gamorra stuff that makes up the actual story is much worse by comparison–and much harder to spin as rage against an unjust world. Which is probably why we didn’t have any celebratory “Superman assists in Bay of Pigs style military operation” articles last October.

 You May Also Like

William Schwartz

William Schwartz is a reporter and film critic based in Seoul, South Korea. He writes primarily for HanCinema, the world's largest and most popular English language database for South Korean television dramas and films.

7 thoughts on “The Dumb Adventures of Woke Superman

  • January 27, 2022 at 10:09 am
    Permalink

    Not being straight is “woke”… Poor thing.

    Reply
    • January 27, 2022 at 4:52 pm
      Permalink

      You read this article and that’s what you think the writer is saying? Poor thing.

      Reply
  • January 27, 2022 at 1:56 pm
    Permalink

    Whoever wrote is a very blatant homophobe- So angry over so little, it’s actually funny. A grown man by the name of William Schwartz living in 2022 made an entire article over a single panel. You’ve got to feel sorry for the guy. Filled with so much hatred over a very common, normal thing. This is why right conservatives are ruining DC; It is nothing but a community of sensitive whiny old babies. Thank god I can still enjoy DC on the right side of history.

    Reply
  • January 29, 2022 at 11:51 am
    Permalink

    That’s why the sales of Son of Kal EL are under top 50!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂

    Reply
  • February 5, 2022 at 8:56 pm
    Permalink

    Absolutely all DC comics are mediocre fanfics, I used to buy them for Batman and Red Hood, last year despite the shit they’ve thrown I supported them until I couldn’t take it anymore, at the moment I’m buying Venom and manga, no more DC sucks when it comes to writing, some comics lament the great art of some cartoonists and colorists.

    Reply
  • February 7, 2022 at 4:09 pm
    Permalink

    SO much stupid packed into one article. Where to begin?

    “Last October saw a shocking event . . .”
    A man kissing a man is “shocking?” You’re an idiot.

    “it’s only just recently that anyone could actually try to find out for themselves the context behind these seemingly bewildering scenes.”
    Uh huh. The “context” has been laid for several issues. The fact that you weren’t paying attention is why you’re “bewildered.” Well, that, and the fact that: you’re an Idiot.

    “. . .superhero movies are of such exceptional importance to the zeitgeist while superhero comics are almost entirely irrelevant”
    Um. . .what exactly is your metric for a medium’s “importance to the zeitgeist”??? You sound like an almost-bright 13-year-old who just learned a new word. Idiot.

    “After resting, Superman kisses Jay. They have only met a few times over the entire story. It’s a very shoehorned, irrelevant, and distracting romantic subplot that’s only really in the story at all to justify the existence of the gay kiss panel.”
    Absurd. The fact that *you* haven’t been paying attention to the previous books, and the growing bond between the characters, does NOT mean this scene is “shoehorned,” “irrelevant,” or “distracting.” (Hint: it’s None Of Those.)

    You know what? I could continue to eviscerate your absurd screed, but what’s the point? You’re an idiot. Protip: There’s no need to tilt your head back and bray absurdities, just to show this fact to everyone.

    Reply
  • March 2, 2022 at 6:53 pm
    Permalink

    Um…’shocking’ seemed clearly sarcastic, and only 1/3 of the article was even about the sexuality issue.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.