Memories of Reading John Jakes

The works of the pop-history writer, who died last week at age 90, were my first foray into “grownup” fiction

The author John Jakes died last week at age 90. I try not to let the deaths of people I didn’t know personally affect me, but news of John Jakes’s death filled me with a bit of nostalgia. I read his novel ‘The Bastard’ at age 10, in 1980. It was an absurd pre-Revolutionary War melodrama, but was, nonetheless, the first book “for adults” that I ever read. There it sat on my family’s middlebrow bookshelf, alongside ‘The Eye of the Needle,’ ‘The Bourne Identity,’ ‘The Mirror Crack’d,’ ‘The Thorn Birds,’ and many other books that I also soon read once The Bastard broke the seal.

I tore through it quickly and easily while dipping the contents of a box of Triscuits one by one into a tasty container of port-wine cheddar cheese spread. Within a month, I savaged the entire eight volumes of “The Kent Family Chronicles,” which told the story of the inheritors of The Bastard and also some people who ended up working for the family. When I was done, I thought I knew a lot about American history.

I didn’t love the work of John Jakes because he was a good writer. He wasn’t. And it wasn’t because he was an “important” writer, though lord knows what that even means anymore. But in his heyday, he was extremely popular. For years, you saw the Kent Family Chronicles, with their alternating red-white-and-blue covers, at the front of every bookstore and library. Then they moved to used bookstores. For a while, they were prominent at garage sales. Now they are mostly gone from sight. But what covers! Especially the fourth volume, “The Furies,” with a pistol-holding Susan Saint James lookalike on the cover.

John Jakes

Get a load of that foxy broad. I believe her name was “Amanda Kent.” American history has never enjoyed such a ripped bodice. Not pictured, to the left, is Abraham Lincoln. That’s what was so fun about The Kent Family Chronicles. The stories were unbelievably corny and weirdly jingoistic, but every so often Andrew Jackson would show up. “The bearded man extended his hand. My name is George Armstrong Custer.” That sort of thing. For a pre-teen with a taste for reading history, they were perfect cannon fodder for a lazy summer afternoon. They even made a Bastard miniseries in 1978, featuring the hilarious casting choice of Tom Bosley as Benjamin Franklin.

But The Kent Family Chronicles were merely Jakes’s warmup act. His “North And South” trilogy, about two white families torn asunder by the Civil War, sold something like 11 billion copies worldwide and became a miniseries starring Patrick Swayze. I don’t remember much about North And South, other than its protagonist was named “Orry Main,” and that he had an older brother named Cooper. One chapter began with the thrilling sentence “Cooper Main loved Charleston.” I mean, who doesn’t? All that Low Country cuisine! By the time the North and South trilogy concluded in the mid-90s, I’d become a full-on snob and was reading much trendier literary fare, but John Jakes kept a place in my heart. You always remember your first.

John Jakes published during the era of the Great American Doorstop novel. James Michener perfected the form, and he was many times the writer that Jakes was. But in their era, Jakes equalled Michener’s sales. No one researched better and harder than James Michener. His historical novels were actual history. But he had a stiff, dull narrative style, with unmemorable characterization. Even his best book, ‘Centennial,’ featured endless pages about rock formation and dinosaur migration, when what we really wanted to read about was cowboys. Jakes didn’t concern himself with historical accuracy beyond the very basic outlines. His books were all sex and drama and character and lousy dialogue. He told a certain kind of American story.

In that time, I also loved the novels of Herman Wouk and Howard Fast, but both were very Jew-centric, Wouk focusing on World War II, mostly, and Fast on a turn-of-the-20th century immigrant narrative. There were no Jews in the work of John Jakes, not that I remember, anyway. The Bastard was a Scotch-Irish bastard, and his progeny made good on their manifest destiny.

Sometimes I find myself looking for a contemporary John Jakes. I get so tired of today’s version of history, which postulates the absurd notion that we’re all connected across gossamer strands of time and space, while ignoring what people really like about historical fiction, which is sexy ladies holding long guns and handsome Confederates named Orry. Contemporary fiction is so full of itself, but the world continues to roil. History lurches forward, and god knows it’s still full of bastards.

 You May Also Like

Neal Pollack

Bio: Neal Pollack is The Greatest Living American writer and the former editor-in-chief of Book and Film Globe.

7 thoughts on “Memories of Reading John Jakes

  • June 16, 2023 at 10:20 am
    Permalink

    If you don’t think John Jakes was a good writer, I’m wondering at some of your other choices….The Thorn Birds was pure trash, for example. This is just a strange article, anyway-“I think this guy’s books were awful, but I’m taking the time to write about him, because…” Why?
    You need a hobby, sir. May I suggest learning some manners?

    Reply
  • September 19, 2023 at 12:55 pm
    Permalink

    I’ve read through John Jake’s The Kent Family Chronicles twice and North and South. I’m a huge fan of John Jake’s. I have no idea how you can say he is not a good writer …. Just WOW.
    PLEASE don’t let this article keep you from reading anything of John Jakes. His writing is superb. You can visualize being there, hearing the sounds the way he describes. Don’t miss both of these book series!

    Reply
    • September 19, 2023 at 1:18 pm
      Permalink

      I loved those books when I was younger, they got me excited about history and they were fun page-turners. But they are not art.

      Reply
  • October 2, 2023 at 2:13 pm
    Permalink

    Are you one of those types who barely tolerate the mixture of melodrama and history? Because you sound like a snob. Jakes had his flaws, but I’ve always regarded him as a first-rate writer.

    Reply
  • January 11, 2025 at 5:03 pm
    Permalink

    Just had the identical passionate debate rage on a group text with my siblings. I was feeling mopey and thinking about our parents and simply asked whether it was just Dad who had absolutely no standards in books and adding that I absolutely loved Kent Family Chronicles and vowed to read them again. At least one text was that I needed to stop trying to be funny and that our parents were true lovers of literature. Warmed my heart to see someone else catch grief for having to nerve to suggest that John Jakes did not deserve a Pulitzer.
    Okay, I guess, my parents loved literature. I do know that I learned amazing words like pudenda by jumping to the last pages of each chapter in a smutty Lawrence Sanders novel.
    Maybe the deadly sins are where I should revisit my childhood. Or maybe the spy books that always had a Nazi villain.
    My favorite memory of my mother is her looking up from a book she was almost halfway through and commenting “Sweetie, I think I read this last week.”
    Yes, contemporary John Jakes sounds good. Sign me up for wordy, heavy, cheesy/smutty books serialized into many, many, books that we can consume and then immediately forget.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *